[MURG] new Road Map draft

Ed Minchau spider_boris at yahoo.com
Sun Jun 8 07:41:46 EST 2003


 --- king-yin yan <y.k.y at lycos.com> wrote: > From:
cat13 at illrepute.org
<snikt>
> >a) why must the person be immobile if the wires
> aren't physically
> >attached to the computer?
> >b) the biological body won't necessarily be
> discarded after
> >uploading
> 
> a) The wireless idea may work, I'll be content with
> living with
> a long cable attached to me.
> b) That's weird. No comment.
> 
> 

hi yky,

B) is not as weird as it seems, if a NON-destructive
upload procedure is used instead.  Picture
free-roaming robots, smaller than neurons by an order
of mgnitude or more, which perform the equivalent
function of scanning the brain and transmitting
information to an external device; they would not need
to destroy tissue to do so.  In the end, the original
would be left alive, and the upload would exist in
another substrate.  No need to destroy the tissue
means no requirement for body disposal.

:) ed

______________________________________________________________________ 
Post your free ad now! http://personals.yahoo.ca



More information about the Murg mailing list