[MURG] new Road Map draft
Ed Minchau
spider_boris at yahoo.com
Mon Jun 9 10:16:29 EST 2003
--- king-yin yan <y.k.y at lycos.com> wrote: > >> >b)
the biological body won't necessarily be
> >> discarded after
> >> >uploading
>
> >B) is not as weird as it seems, if a
> NON-destructive
> >upload procedure is used instead. Picture
> >free-roaming robots, smaller than neurons by an
> order
> >of mgnitude or more, which perform the equivalent
> >function of scanning the brain and transmitting
> >information to an external device; they would not
> need
> >to destroy tissue to do so. In the end, the
> original
> >would be left alive, and the upload would exist in
> >another substrate. No need to destroy the tissue
> >means no requirement for body disposal.
>
> But what's the point of it? The original would still
> face the problem of biological 'death', which is
> what
> I'm most concerned with.
>
>
OK, fair enough. However, it must be pointed out that
even in a gradual-upload scenario, there is no such
thing as "immortality". The heat-death of the
universe will get all of us, eventually.
ed
______________________________________________________________________
Post your free ad now! http://personals.yahoo.ca
More information about the Murg
mailing list