[MURG] homeostating despite rapid flux

[Scalino CORLEONE]

I admit it was not an homomorphic analogy ; I just wanted to point out that
what Ed was talking about could be related to a still unknown law bringing
out an unbendable limit to uploading (as the limit of the speed of light is
considered unbendable).

However, if "The whole shapes the parts as much as the parts shape the
whole. No component of the system is itself stable but the entire production
locks together to have stable existence. This is how you can manage to
persist even though much of you is being recycled by day if not the hour"
(as reports James), it sounds to me like an elegant solution (though I
wasn't too much worried).

And... somehow, as to make another lousy analogy, I could say it reminds me
the ways of the mathematical function called "the Fourier Transformation"
(and its opposite function).

Scal
-----------------------------------------------
 
-----Message d'origine-----
De : murg-admin at minduploading.org [mailto:murg-admin at minduploading.org] De
la part de Anna
Envoyé : vendredi 18 juin 2004 00:31
À : murg at minduploading.org
Objet : Re: [MURG] homeostating despite rapid flux

Amazing observation!  But, why such law?
Is this the fastest speed for the  Universal Q computer  possible?

Anna


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Scalino Corleone" <scalinocorleone at hotmail.com>
To: <murg at minduploading.org>
Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2004 2:56 PM
Subject: Re: [MURG] homeostating despite rapid flux


> >Many snapsots or a "long-exposure" snapshot,
> >or both, may be required.
>
> : or... maybe... a little bit like the famous law which says that mass
> increases with speed until it equals the mass of the universe when speed
is
> equal to the speed of light, only a long-exposure snapshot equal to your
> lifespan could perform a 100% full upload...
>
> Hope I don't waste the mood here...
>
> ----Original Message Follows----
> From: &quot;Anna&quot; &lt;pantheon at ix.netcom.com&gt;
> Reply-To: murg at minduploading.org
> To: &lt;murg at minduploading.org&gt;
> Subject: Re: [MURG] homeostating despite rapid flux
> Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2004 09:28:34 -0700
>
> Could the rate of  refreshment be considered Time, or give illusion of
> time-space?
> Anna
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: &quot;Ed Minchau&quot; &lt;spider_boris at yahoo.com&gt;
> To: &lt;murg at minduploading.org&gt;
> Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2004 9:02 AM
> Subject: Re: [MURG] homeostating despite rapid flux
>
>
> &gt; --- Eugen Leitl &lt;eugen at leitl.org&gt; wrote: &gt;
> &gt; &gt; http://www.sci-con.org/articles/200refere40601.html
> &gt; &gt;
> &gt;
> &gt; Very interesting article, Eugene.  This article
> &gt; portrays the brain to be much like dynamic RAM, each
> &gt; bit of which must be refreshed nearly continuously in
> &gt; order to retain a stable pattern.
> &gt;
> &gt; And, it implies that uploading a &quot;snapshot&quot; of the
> &gt; brain, a view of the brain's state at some particular
> &gt; instant in time, is not sufficient to upload the mind
> &gt; itself.  Many snapsots or a &quot;long-exposure&quot; snapshot,
> &gt; or both, may be required.
> &gt;
> &gt; Ed
> &gt;
> &gt;
______________________________________________________________________
> &gt; Post your free ad now! http://personals.yahoo.ca
> &gt; _______________________________________________
> &gt; MURG mailing list
> &gt; MURG at minduploading.org
> &gt; http://minduploading.org/mailman/listinfo/murg
> &gt;
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> MURG mailing list
> MURG at minduploading.org
> http://minduploading.org/mailman/listinfo/murg
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> MSN Search, le moteur de recherche qui pense comme vous !
> http://search.msn.fr
>
> _______________________________________________
> MURG mailing list
> MURG at minduploading.org
> http://minduploading.org/mailman/listinfo/murg
>


_______________________________________________
MURG mailing list
MURG at minduploading.org
http://minduploading.org/mailman/listinfo/murg