[MURG] homeostating despite rapid flux

[Scalino Corleone]

oops, sorry, you're right to correct me about the physic law.

Though, the universe's mass is finite only in our currently most recognized 
cosmological models (from which the law is extracted by the way), otherwise 
what makes you think its mass can't be infinite? (well, maybe I'm teasing 
you a bit here, and I'm off subject moreover...).

Scalino

----Original Message Follows----
From: "alex mcLin" <alexmclin at hotmail.com>
Reply-To: murg at minduploading.org
To: murg at minduploading.org
Subject: Re: [MURG] homeostating despite rapid flux
Date: Sat, 19 Jun 2004 15:56:44 +0000

no, the given mass won't equal the universe's mass at the speed of the 
light. The mass would be infinite instead.


>From: "Scalino Corleone" <scalinocorleone at hotmail.com>
>Reply-To: murg at minduploading.org
>To: murg at minduploading.org
>Subject: Re: [MURG] homeostating despite rapid flux
>Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2004 23:56:30 +0200
>
>>Many snapsots or a "long-exposure" snapshot,
>>or both, may be required.
>
>: or... maybe... a little bit like the famous law which says that
>mass increases with speed until it equals the mass of the universe
>when speed is equal to the speed of light, only a long-exposure
>snapshot equal to your lifespan could perform a 100% full upload...
>
>Hope I don't waste the mood here...
>
>----Original Message Follows----
>From: "Anna" <pantheon at ix.netcom.com>
>Reply-To: murg at minduploading.org
>To: <murg at minduploading.org>
>Subject: Re: [MURG] homeostating despite rapid flux
>Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2004 09:28:34 -0700
>
>Could the rate of  refreshment be considered Time, or give illusion
>of
>time-space?
>Anna
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Ed Minchau" 
<spider_boris at yahoo.com>
>To: <murg at minduploading.org>
>Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2004 9:02 AM
>Subject: Re: [MURG] homeostating despite rapid flux
>
>
>> --- Eugen Leitl <eugen at leitl.org> wrote: >
>> > http://www.sci-con.org/articles/200refere40601.html
>> >
>>
>> Very interesting article, Eugene.  This article
>> portrays the brain to be much like dynamic RAM, each
>> bit of which must be refreshed nearly continuously in
>> order to retain a stable pattern.
>>
>> And, it implies that uploading a "snapshot" 
of the
>> brain, a view of the brain's state at some particular
>> instant in time, is not sufficient to upload the mind
>> itself.  Many snapsots or a "long-exposure" 
snapshot,
>> or both, may be required.
>>
>> Ed
>>
>>
>______________________________________________________________________
>> Post your free ad now! http://personals.yahoo.ca
>> _______________________________________________
>> MURG mailing list
>> MURG at minduploading.org
>> http://minduploading.org/mailman/listinfo/murg
>>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>MURG mailing list
>MURG at minduploading.org
>http://minduploading.org/mailman/listinfo/murg
>
>_________________________________________________________________
>MSN Search, le moteur de recherche qui pense comme vous !
>http://search.msn.fr
>
>_______________________________________________
>MURG mailing list
>MURG at minduploading.org
>http://minduploading.org/mailman/listinfo/murg


_______________________________________________
MURG mailing list
MURG at minduploading.org
http://minduploading.org/mailman/listinfo/murg

_________________________________________________________________
MSN Search, le moteur de recherche qui pense comme vous !  
http://search.msn.fr/