[MURG] Re: Cryonics costs
Joseph J. Strout
joe at strout.net
Wed Oct 27 13:40:52 EST 2004
At 10:09 AM -0700 10/27/04, Anna wrote:
>This depends on individual memory. But DNA plus an old memory would
>be enough to recreate "you".
>Memory can be recorded right before a natural death and stored till
>ready to use.
"Memory can be recorded"?!? How, exactly? The only way to preserve
memories is to preserve the ultrastructure of the brain. And that's
the whole point of cryonics.
>Cryonics are not an answer since all matter including the "dead
>kind, is a subject to time, and physical damage is almost a bet.
No, a cryonics patient is pretty safe from degradation. Most of the
potential sources of loss (terrorism, natural disaster, etc.) would
apply to a rrecording on some other medium too. And at least it
doesn't face the risk of obsolescence, which is the fate of most
recordings today.
Best,
- Joe
--
,------------------------------------------------------------------.
| Joseph J. Strout Check out the Mac Web Directory: |
| joe at strout.net http://www.macwebdir.com/ |
`------------------------------------------------------------------'
More information about the Murg
mailing list